How National Public Health Cuts Are Putting Essential Care at Risk
Originally posted to Charity Bridge Fund | May 4, 2026
Over the last 18 months, public health providers across the United States have been asked to do more with less. The federal government moved to rescind $11.4 billion in public health grants to states, localities, and health organizations. This funding had supported vaccination, testing, community health workers, addiction and mental health programs, and other core efforts.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services also announced a restructuring in 2025 that would reduce its workforce from 82,000 to 62,000 employees, including about 10,000 additional job cuts on top of earlier departures, with major reductions at the CDC, FDA, and NIH. Together, those changes have weakened the infrastructure that nonprofits and their communities depend on for funding prevention, disease surveillance, research, and access to care.
At the same time, Congress enacted the 2025 Federal Budget Reconciliation Law, signed on July 4, 2025, which bars federal Medicaid payments for one year to certain reproductive health entities. Based on the law’s criteria, this affects providers across 39 states. This means that federal Medicaid dollars were cut to reimbursement for contraception, STI care, cancer screenings, pregnancy testing, vasectomy care, and other routine preventive services. The stakes are high because organizations serve large populations. For example, Planned Parenthood serves more than 2 million patients nationwide each year, and more than half use Medicaid.
The result is a broader public health crisis with highly local consequences. As insurance losses are projected to rise under recent federal policy changes, the same safety-net providers that millions of people rely on are facing funding freezes, reimbursement bans, workforce cuts, and clinic closures. A national pattern has formed in which funding cuts are narrowing access to basic preventive care for people who already face the greatest barriers to getting it.
From the Frontlines of a Growing Emergency
Written by Lo (Lauren) Heimer, Planned Parenthood of Southern New England
Planned Parenthood of Southern New England (PPSNE) serves more than 60,000 patients each year, many of whom rely on it as their only source of health care. The vast majority face significant economic and structural barriers to care. 82% live at or below 250% of the federal poverty level, 42% rely on Medicaid, and 20% are uninsured. Many are low-income women, Black, Latinx, and other people of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, and young people, communities that are more likely to experience systemic discrimination and reduced access to preventive care.
These barriers have real consequences. They contribute to higher rates of STIs and HIV, more unintended pregnancies, and worse outcomes for breast and cervical cancer and maternal health.
Right now, that care is at risk.
Last summer, Congress cut funding to Planned Parenthood as part of the 2025 Federal Budget Reconciliation Law at a loss of $12 million in Medicaid reimbursements annually. Since then, PPSNE has continued to serve Medicaid patients without any reimbursement, providing about 18,000 visits and absorbing up to $800,000 per month just to ensure people aren’t turned away. While the State of CT has committed some one-time relief to help offset losses this year, that funding has not yet been received by PPSNE, and there is no additional funding promised beyond June.
Looking ahead, that makes the situation even more serious. Up to $10 million in federal funding is at risk next year, roughly 22% of PPSNE’s budget. At the same time, PPSNE is already operating at a deficit due to years of underpayment from public and private insurance companies, in some cases reimbursed at only 25–30% of the actual cost of care, and skyrocketing health care costs across the region.
These aren’t abstract numbers. They determine whether people can get cancer screenings, birth control, STI testing, or simply see a trusted provider.
There’s also a lot of misunderstanding about what Planned Parenthood does. At PPSNE, about 12% of visits are for abortion care. The vast majority is preventive and primary care that keeps people healthy. It is also worth noting that abortion care is not covered by federal Medicaid dollars, meaning those services are funded separately through the state.
We’re already seeing what happens when funding disappears. 51 Planned Parenthood health centers closed across the country in 2025, many in underserved areas, leaving entire communities without access to care.
Connecticut hasn’t seen closures yet, but that is not guaranteed. As access has disappeared in other parts of the country, PPSNE is playing an increasingly critical role in ensuring care remains available in this region. That makes it even more urgent that we ensure PPSNE has the resources to serve everyone who needs care.
Act Now
Without immediate financial intervention, the consequences for public health systems will be significant and far-reaching. These funding gaps will lead to more delayed diagnoses, untreated infections, and missed opportunities for early intervention — moments when care is most effective and least costly. Preventive services and screenings are often the first line of defense, and when they are reduced or eliminated, conditions that could have been managed early become far more complex and expensive to treat later.
The reality is that the cost of not investing in prevention doesn’t disappear — it compounds. When individuals lose access to basic care, they are more likely to seek treatment only when conditions become acute, often through emergency rooms or crisis services. This shifts costs onto already strained public systems, increasing the financial burden on hospitals, state programs, and ultimately taxpayers. What might have been addressed through relatively low-cost screenings or routine care can turn into long-term, high-cost medical needs, including hospitalizations, chronic disease management, and more intensive interventions.
Beyond the direct healthcare costs, there are broader social and economic impacts. Untreated health issues can affect people’s ability to work, care for their families, and remain stable in housing and employment. This creates ripple effects across communities — impacting productivity, increasing reliance on social services, and placing additional pressure on public infrastructure. In this way, cuts to public health funding are not isolated — they contribute to a cycle that is both humanly and economically costly.
Acting now is critical. Supporting these services in the present moment helps prevent a much larger and more complex set of challenges down the line. It is not only a matter of maintaining programs, but of preserving the underlying health and resilience of communities. Protecting public health organizations means protecting access to early care, reducing long-term costs, and ensuring that fewer people fall through the cracks when intervention could still make a meaningful difference.